home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
-
- Reported by Keith McCloghrie/Hughes LAN Systems
-
- IEEE 802.3 Hub MIB Minutes
-
- Since this was the first meeting of the Hub MIB Working Group, the first
- item of business was discussion of the Working Group's charter. The
- discussion emphasised that the focus would be on development of a
- Repeater MIB. The possibility of writing a MIB to represent a modular
- chassis containing multiple repeaters/bridges/terminal-servers/etc. was
- seen as a potential future work item, depending on the wishes of the NM
- Area Director and the Working-Group members, but any such effort would
- take second place to the development of the Repeater MIB.
-
- Donna McMaster then gave an overview of how an initial draft of a
- Repeater MIB had been produced as a literal translation from the work of
- the IEEE Hub Management Task Force's MIB. This draft and a set of
- proposed changes had been distributed on the mailing-list. Some of
- these had been accepted, and some had been the subject of questions
- and/or differing views. Thus, a new draft had been produced having one
- section (section 7) documenting its differences from the IEEE MIB, and
- another (section 8) documenting the outstanding issues. This draft had
- also been distributed to the mailing-list, and submitted as an Internet
- Draft.
-
- After a review of the changes made so far, the Working-Group approved
- the consensus reached on the mailing-list in agreeing to these changes.
- A suggestion was also made to change the names of SelfTest1 and
- SelfTest2 to be more descriptive of their function, i.e., non-disruptive
- and disruptive, respectively.
-
- The next item on the agenda was discussion of the outstanding issues.
- The discussion began with the most fundamental issue: whether or not
- the MIB should explicitly allow for an agent managing multiple
- repeaters. Various arguments were made for each side of the argument.
- Much of the discussion was intertwined with discussion of how to manage
- a chassis containing multiple cards (repeaters, bridges, etc.) and
- having multiple (separate) LAN segments on its backplane.
-
- Arguments for defining a MIB to manage just one repeater:
-
-
- o The simple agent is simpler,
-
- o Multiple repeaters can be managed through multiple MIB views,
- through proxy, or through multiple agents.
-
- o A single repeater doesn't necessarily (usually?) correspond to an
- individual card.
-
- o For consistency with the Bridge-MIB, which manages only one Bridge.
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
- Arguments for defining a MIB with the explicit ability to manage
- multiple repeaters:
-
-
- o An agent which manages multiple repeaters is simpler.
- o A single repeater doesn't necessarily correspond to an individual
- card.
- o Consistent with MIB-II's interfaces group.
-
-
- After much discussion, a straw poll has called and resulted in a 15-15
- tie. Regretfully, the meeting decided that the Working-Group would have
- to try to resolve the issue on the mailing-list, and if that failed then
- to schedule a meeting in the September/October timeframe, possibly at
- Interop.
-
- The issue of optional tables was also discussed, and the consensus was
- that the distinction between the basic and monitoring groups should be
- maintained.
-
- At this point, the meeting ran out of time, and it was agreed to take up
- the discussion of the remaining issues on the mailing-list.
-
- Attendees
-
- Steve Bostock steveb@novell.com
- Howard Brown brown@ctron.com
- Jeffrey Case case@cs.utk.edu
- John Cook cook@chipcom.com
- Dave Cullerot cullerot@ctron.com
- James Davin jrd@ptt.lcs.mit.edu
- Gary Ellis garye@hpspd.spd.hp.com
- Mike Erlinger mike@mti.com
- Bill Fardy fardy@ctron.com
- Jeff Fried jmf@relay.proteon.com
- Shawn Gallagher gallagher@quiver.enet.dec.com
- Phillip Hasse phasse@honchuca-emh8.army.mil
- Mark Hoerth mark_hoerth@hp0400.desk.hp.com
- Ron Jacoby rj@sgi.com
- Mike Janson mjanson@mot.com
- Ken Jones konkord!ksj@uunet.uu.net
- Frank Kastenholz kasten@europa.clearpoint.com
- Manu Kaycee kaycee@trlian.enet.dec.com
- Mark Kerestes att!alux2!hawk@uunet.uu.net
- Kenneth Key key@cs.utk.edu
- Cheryl Krupczak cheryl@cc.gatech.edu
- Chao-Yu Liang cliang@synoptics.com
- Keith McCloghrie kzm@hls.com
- Evan McGinnis bem@3com.com
- Donna McMaster mcmaster@synoptics.com
- Lynn Monsanto monsanto@eng.sun.com
- David Perkins dperkins@synoptics.com
- Jason Perreault perreaul@interlan.interlan.com
- John Pickens jrp@3com.com
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
- Anil Rijsinghani anil@levers.enet.dec.com
- Jonathan Saperia saperia@tcpjon.enet.dec.com
- Mark Schaefer schaefer@davidsys.com
- Anil Singhal nsinghal@hawk.ulowell.edu
- Bob Stewart rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com
- Emil Sturniolo emil@dss.com
- Bruce Taber taber@interlan.com
- Geoffrey Thompson thompson@synoptics.com
- Dean Throop throop@dg-rtp.dg.com
- Steven Waldbusser waldbusser@andrew.cmu.edu
- Philip C. Wang watadn!phil@uunet.uu.net
- Drew Wansley dwansley@secola.columbia.ncr.com
- David Ward dward@chipcom.com
- Joseph Zur fibrontics!zur@uunet.uu.net
-
-
-
- 3
-